
The archetypal illustrations that support your demonstration are powerful tools, but could they not have been exploited even further?
For example, Time, embodied in the figure of Cronos. What does this intellectually structuring atavistic figure fundamentally personify? Why does he devour his children? How does Cronos intrinsically take part in the creation of the world in Greek myth? - Is it not because he gives rise to Space and Time, and both are absolutely inseparable? The castration of his father, Ouranos, forces the latter to separate from Gaia, his mother. Through this action, the Sky appears above and the Earth below. Finally, Gaia can give birth to her children, symbolizing the emergence of GENERATIONS, history and temporality.
Finally, Chronos only gains his "h" when he begins irremediably to devour his own children, as Time devours its own in an immutable direction: the years devouring the months, the months swallowing the weeks, the weeks feasting on the days, the days consuming the hours, which sate themselves on the minutes, themselves savouring the seconds...
What is time?
Does time exist in isolation?
As for the measurement of its flow and the special relativity intrinsic to it, if speed is taken as the frame of reference, what happens in the case of a variation of c? What is the flow of time like in a universe where c = infinity? Conversely, does information go on accumulating in a universe where c = 0? Is there a continuum of worlds graded gradually between the two? What would the beings who might populate the most extreme spaces be like? Are "foreigners" who differ only by their "distant" space-time position in a common frame of reference really foreigners?
---
A tweeter, Manuel R., proposed to explain the difference between the WAAM formed by an infinite but countable set of IBOZOO UU (which M.R. calls Primordial Elements, "PE") and the WAAM BB, in which a single PE represents that whole universe according to letter D105-2, by likening them to Cantor's transfinite numbers, Aleph-0 and Aleph-1, since in that way a single "continuous" PE, through an infinitesimal variation of its orientations, even before these began, would contain a greater quantity of information (continuous versus discrete) than a WAAM formed by an infinite countable set of PE could ever contain.
Callirhoe Déicoon passed on to him this answer from Daedalus, and so, in keeping with the end of this text, we have modified the end of letter D105-2.
---

The PE representative of the limit Universe (c = infinity) cannot be approximated by the mathematical concept of the alephs (neither Aleph-0 nor Aleph-one), since these are the cardinals of ORDERED sets (countable or not).
You say: "A universe formed by a single continuous PE contains infinitely more information in each of its angular variations"; but a PE only has "angular variations" with respect to another PE. Otherwise, how is it possible to speak of "angular variations"?
This limit universe (c = infinity) therefore has the following characteristics:
- It can reflect the TOTALITY of information ("cardinality").
- In an instantaneous way, that is, with no time interval (no Δt, no "angular variations"). It is a "holophrastic" structure. - Therefore there is no DIRECTION, nor ORIENTATION, of the arrow of time (D105-2 "meaning → direction". Error due to the polysemy of the term).
This accumulation of information does not come from a "comparison", nor from the awareness of a "difference" between two moments. Therefore there is no "order" (≠ possible ordered sets).
What do you deduce from this?

We can think about this.
The collective sphere has no free will.
Free will is the end product of a slow and progressive configuration of matter towards the spiritual.
And: the psychic convergence of the Universe upon itself continues with free souls.
Consequently: the collective sphere becomes a free Superconsciousness.
Therefore: : The convergence of free Superconsciousnesses gives ... ?