A site dedicated to the rational study of the UMMO affair
D79 The concept of WOA.
THE CONCEPT OF WOA.
You have a beautiful myth: Tantalus, King of Lydia, condemned never to satisfy his appetite despite having the dishes within his reach. Any EESEOEMI IGIO (THINKING BEING) must also suffer the consequences of its own essence. The WAAM is inaccessible. The WAAM that he sees, that he touches, that he feels thermally, that he thinks, in short, is transformed by him in that thinking process.
But the AAIIODI, with its multiple forms of “BEING”: IT IS HERE-IN-MY-WAAM. Can something or someone accede to it, think of it, without deforming it? Can someone or something penetrate the AAIIOYA without its being permuted into S1 S2 S3 ................. Sn? That someone or something is WOA or Generator; it is what you on EARTH would call GOD, if the “GOD” of your theological schools were less anthropomorphic than our concept of “NECESSARY ENTITY”.
We say that WOA generates the WAAMWAAM (multiple Cosmos). We use the word “generate” arbitrarily, not as a strict synonym of the verb “CREATE” but as a transcription of our phoneme IIWOAE. I have told you that WOA is the only “thinking” “entity” that does not deform the AIIODI. Using words of EARTH, even at the risk of anthropomorphizing the concept we are trying to set out for you, we shall say that WOA coexists with AIIODI, that AIIODI is not transcendent to him. AIIODI is an “ACT” of WOA; it is generated without WOA having previously potentiated it. In this way “THE THINKING OF WOA” bears no relation whatsoever to our thinking process as dimensional beings.
We therefore affirm that BEING is not IMMANENT, it is not a term of our subjective consciousness, although it is this consciousness that shapes it, distorting a reality (AIIODI) that hides behind our deforming intellectual vision of the ENTITY. WOA thus generates all the possible forms S1 S2 S3 ................. Sn, and their subgroups constitute as many WAAM. Put another way, WOA generates infinitely many cosmoses by generating infinitely many kinds of thinking beings; but the proposition “THERE ARE INFINITELY MANY WAAM” is valid only for us, EESEOEMII (thinking beings), who, by deforming the AIIOYAA as many times as there are kinds of thinking “SELF”, create for ourselves the illusion of a very rich range of ontological possibilities.
Expressed in a commonplace way: “from WOA’s side” the WAAM (Universe) does not present the wide range of forms familiar to our intellect; WOA does not even regard it as something that EXISTS or that DOES NOT EXIST..., or that 
EXISTS; for WOA it is simply AIIODI, eternal and immutable like him. (We use the word “eternal” here not as a synonym of infinite time),
OUR IDEA OF WOA.
To speak of WOA, whose essence we do not know, while constrained to use a foreign language whose logical bases are bivalent, is truly difficult. On UMMO, when we use the phonetic expression AIOOYA AMIIE (whose literal transcription would be “DOES NOT EXIST”) we are referring either to abstract concepts or ideas, or to WOA. We mean to express something different from AIOODI (INACCESSIBLE ENTITY), since AIOODI presents itself to us with “dimensions”, while WOA is ADIMENSIONAL, that is, not susceptible of being deformed by our thought. Thus we say AIOOYA IBONEE (cosmic radiations exist) or AAINNUO-AIOOYA-AMIE (symmetry does not exist).
WOA is adimensional. On this point we agree with the theologians of EARTH. It makes no sense to speak of “Eternity”, time, thought or mind in the essence of WOA.
But his reason for AIOOYA AMIIE is precisely that of being the genesis of the idea of AIOODI. We have told you that AIIOODI is the Entity that does not transcend to us as it is, but distorted, broken into multiple forms (WAAMWAAM).
It is in this sense that we can (from our familiar angle) imagine that in WOA “there is” a mind generating ideas, infinitely many ideas, provided that those ideas are not incompatible with the essence of WAAM-.
But we do not attribute qualities to WOA, nor do we associate with his AIOBII (See Note 10) (U-C Note: This note is missing) humanoid functions that would anthropomorphize his concept, as the theologians of EARTH unfortunately did in past epochs. The predicates of GOODNESS, of CREATOR, of JUST, of CRUEL and similar ones make no sense if they are linked to “that which AIOBII” (This is the case of WOA).
When we translate the phoneme IIWOAE by the Spanish word “generar” (generate), we prostitute its genuine meaning, since our concept of IIWOAE is NOT synonymous with “GENERATE” or “CREATE” as you understand them, that is, “the function that allows an Entity with prior existence to bring forth a CONTINGENT ENTITY whose constituent elements did not pre-exist”. (See Note 11). (U-C Note: This note is missing)
We realize perfectly well the confusion that may overcome you when trying to understand these paragraphs. It is not our fault.
Using your familiar logic, we shall symbolize this concept:
Seen from man’s perspective, WOA (God) “creates” the bases of some atoms, generates some laws that govern the Cosmos; but from WOA’s perspective the function “generate”, “create”, even “COEXIST”, has no meaning.
It is necessary to insist on the great difference we observe between our concept of the genesis of WOA (as seen by an OEMMI) and that concept of generation as it would be apprehended if we placed ourselves (an absurd possibility) at WOA’s “point of view”.
For us, WOA generates an infinity of ideas, ideas which, as excrescences of a “SUPREME BEING”, must be REALIZED, must EXIST OUTSIDE OR INSIDE US. Thus he is capable of generating as many cosmoses as thinking entities we can imagine.
But from that hypothetical angle of WOA everything is different. He (coexists-generates) with the AIOODI, or the AIOODIs (it makes no sense to use a quantitative qualifier); but a thinking being is simultaneously AIOODI which in turn, on thinking of “it”, deforms it into a thousand ontological facets, generating its own WAAM, its own COSMOS. There thus arise as many WAAM as there are possible EESEOEMI compatible with the “mind of WOA”.
For WOA, then, the pluricosmos (WAAMWAAM) will make no sense, but not so for us, thinking men.
But let us continue with our process as “seen” by me (THINKING-SELF)
WOA, among the infinity of ideas that coexist with his essence, imagines that of a “BEING” which, being adimensional, is capable of distorting its own AAIODI (that is: of thinking, of generating ideas). Such a “BEING” (A BEING for my concept: AAIODI for WOA) must then be free. Observe that if it were not, its genesis of ideas would make no sense, since they would be attributable to WOA and would therefore not be IDEAS (in the conceptual sense you give to that word) but AAIODI.
Nor is it logical to imagine this “BEING” being free and generating another AAIODI, for it would be a duplicate of WOA. (WOA therefore cannot generate such a BEING).
It is thus that BUAWE BIAEI “has been generated” (it can be translated as COMMUNITY or SOCIAL SPIRIT), which represents, as we shall explain later, the collectivity of EESEOEMII or (thinking beings) incapable of penetrating the essence of the AIODI, since their attempt causes a “mutation” in it, as we explained earlier.
How many BUAWE BIAEI “exist”?, that is: how many kinds of thinking groups are there? Are all BUAWE BIAEI identical in their essence? Is the TERRESTRIAL BUAWE BIAEI the same as that of UMMO?
We shall try to answer these questions in order, but first it is necessary to clarify the double interpretation that the phoneme BUAWE BIAEI represents for us. A first meaning (the ancestral one) is synonymous with “COLLECTIVITY OF EESEOMI”. The second represents our present concept of “COLLECTIVE SPIRIT”. Without this clarification we might fall into a fallacy of an amphibological character (U-C Note: RAE dictionary – Amphibology: double meaning; a fault of a word, clause or manner of speaking that admits more than one interpretation) that would make our thought even more difficult to understand.
If we keep to the first meaning, it is obvious that we do not know empirically how many kinds of CONSCIOUS AND THINKING beings may exist in the WAAM-WAAM (the set of Universes coexisting with WOA).
If we accept the definition of WAAM-WAAM in the strict sense, there must exist as many WAAM as there are kinds of thinking beings capable of deforming the AAIODI.
Adopting also the word BUAWE BIAEII as a synonym of homogeneous collectivity, you men of EARTH, we OEMII of UMMO and ALL humans who possess our neurocortical structure and whose mental processes develop on analogous bases, belong to it; but as regards the other meaning (collective soul), we confess to you that we have not yet been able to solve this enigma. (One among many reasons for our coming to your OYAA lies in carrying out a thorough study of the problem.)
