A site dedicated to the rational study of the UMMO affair
D76 Our conception of the AIOOYAAIODI.
OUR CONCEPTION OF THE AIOOYAAIODI.
Any thinker of EARTH will recognize the insurmountable difficulty involved in projecting onto untrained minds abstract concepts that reflect the whole ideological richness of the various philosophical schools.
Our claim to set out such conceptions for you, condensed into a few paragraphs, sterilizes from the outset any possibility of harmonizing criteria and giving them the appropriate form that we accept. But it will at least serve you to sketch, with quick brushstrokes, an image of the structure of our thought.
The advances achieved in the field of Cosmology have shed enough light for the speculations of our ideologues to abandon the shifting ground of intuitions, and for us to rely on a refined, all-embracing empiricism that has allowed us to formulate hypotheses much more consistent than those of former times.
We can reveal to you that the first “shock” suffered by the former mechanistic conceptions of the Cosmos was caused when our cosmophysicists came to ascertain the genuine nature of physical space.
Our model of the Cosmos is capable of satisfactorily explaining all the questions that arise not only in Physics but in the biological and psychophysical domain. It is compatible with the rich phenomenology of which we are optional observers.
It is not, however, a definitive and perfect model, a real one, simply because, although it answers our own questions (what is being?, what is non-being?... what is ψ being? Why are we here... what is the necessary “entity”? (Observe that I try to reflect the formulations most familiar to you)), and therefore, by harmoniously satisfying our subjective aspirations to knowledge, we sophistically introduce some false convictions.
That there exists a model objective to us. That, by satisfying our own mental schemes, proper to beings with a definite neurocortical structure, we can describe the OUTSIDE-MY-MIND as a concept “apprehended” in its whole totality, without taking into account that another thinking entity DIFFERENT-FROM-MY-STRUCTURE might also satisfy its formulations, reaching results that would be repugnant to my STRUCTURAL-SELF but would be perfectly valid for it.
But this is a corollary to the disquieting question posed first: Is there an objective model of the “Cosmos”? For if the answer is negative, the confusion introduced would make any hope of certainty impossible.
But before expressing our ideas about beings, about the AIOOYAAIODI (DIMENSIONAL ENTITY), let us see how we approach the problem of information, whose perversion would make any possibility of understanding each other impossible.
